luni, 10 septembrie 2018

On "Lunar Menstrual Chronograms from the Danube Civilization to procreate a Child of the Moon" | Marco Merlini - Academia.edu

Lunar Menstrual Chronograms from the Danube Civilization to procreate a Child of the Moon | Marco Merlini - Academia.edu
http://www.academia.edu/19697139/Lunar_Menstrual_Chronograms_from_the_Danube_Civilization_to_procreate_a_Child_of_the_Moon

My coments:

Some researchers found an intriguing fact that the signs "D D o o" situated on upper-right side of the Tartaria tablet are high challenging.
From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKKKiCnEvl6Z4zCot6RhZfpSMkbvyPwiyErLWDlnK8uTVArcWf3r1_DdwHAgPptLi5FAf1X46-rHIUSQvKphwmjVs9Vwn01f2Jh6eeTZPyF2h3NIj1y_MGW5s1xwVDsG8tFbPaQCCgcDfG/s320/NEgrid.JPG

For me also, at the time supposed to be written there were no invented yet D-shaped signs.

Close shape has sumerian proto-cuneiform numbers.


+++++


D D o o    could be:
grain,bread
1, 1, 10, 10 so, "21 portions of grain"
Even if we have the signs: "D1  D2  o  o(?"c"?)" 
the sequence there are:
"D1"-sign, identical with ninda (bread) sign wich in proto-cuneiform is in the shape of a D with an inner stroke paralel with that left-side,
"D2" sign is identical with proto-cuneiform D-shape numbers, but sumerian used to imprint the stylus not scratching/cutting.
"o" was used for "10"
"c" was not used ?
If "D1(Ninda) D2 o o" would be: bread. 1(60) 10 10" so "21 bread" 

But I am stressing that sumerians not made numbers only by imprinting.

So the tablet was no written by an native sumerian nor we have proper/genuine sumerian writing.
The same opinion had before me A.A.Vaiman "On quasi-sumerian tablets from Tartaria".
He found other clues (different technique). other than sumerian on the tablets.
I supposed on my part to have "D"-shape sign as moon.
=====================================================
From https://scontent.ftsr1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/41445884_1418037924995800_3842601952902905856_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=84da29ccb7163812f4a72ac68818060f&oe=5BF0C87F

================================================================
But found non-sense with those twoo repeating D-s folowed by apparent 2 full-moons. As phisical phenomenom, in reality full/black moon and in-between quarterrs are inter-changing, not folowing/repeating the same sequence.
Also I made my mind to have in the left side those "HD"-like signs as for Sun-Moon.
In chinese writing there was used an H-like sign with 3 horiz, strokes (ni) as for Sun, also I thought of He(ta) as for Helios.All in vain.
In the Linear A reading aproach I took "HD" sequence on the left side as Pa-moon=Pa Men, close to poimen, "shepperd"
One of the best renderings, maybe even better than sumerian-one is Mr. Merlini's interpretation as the phases of the Moon.
His paper an aproach is outstanding.
With a single reserve:
Could have there the Moon phases but in my opinion the moon phases were not yet related at that time to an "female fertility calendar"
==================================================================
I made myself searches on astronomy-biology relation throught the time and nowdays, and I found:
-Out of average lunar timing/cycle (rotation) wich has 
1. the time in wich the moon shows the same phase and 
2. exact the time of one complete revolution, we have an medium/average cycle of 28 days.
I found that out of an medium time of the above twoo, (average same round 28 days) time cycle of moon and female cycle there is no exact or direct relation or match.
Especially due of the fact that every female have an personal cycle independent of the moon phases.
In mithology I found stories to become pregnant at full moon.Nothing proved real.
More than this, fertility female human is expanding in an quite large time extention.
More than this the ovulation time is so individualised that even fatigue, stress, body temperature, ilness and manyother factors are conducting to a situation that:
-nature are aware of all good and bad influences and ovulation occur only when the best conditions are met.If not best kind of optimising occur.

http://www.mothernaturepartnership.org/fact-or-fiction-are-the-moon-and-menstruation-connected/


Women’s cycles are a little more…unpredictable. Our systems are a complex biological loop that can be affected by stress, hormones, sickness, and even exercise. It’s common for people’s cycles to vary between 21 days and 35 days. Even women who report regular periods can have an unpredictably long or short cycle once in a while. Here’s why: each month, the body tries to release an egg at the best time to achieve pregnancy. If the body senses a fever or stress hormones, there’s no use releasing an egg into a body that’s too hot, stressed, or hungry to keep it healthy. Our bodies are willing to wait a little while to keep the egg optimized and ready for fertilization, and that’s when we’re faced with a cycle that’s longer than usual.

Menstrual cycles seem to fall along roughly the same timelines, and it can be tempting to use the moon’s cycles to track an ovulatory or menstrual cycle. Tempting, but unless you’re ready to pick out baby names, you might want to rethink it. Studies that link the moon with fertility or contraception have been inconclusive, and for a good reason: every woman is different. Every cycle can be different.
Even if (from same above):"It can also be beautiful to consider yourself part of the fabric of the natural world. It can be empowering to remember that cultures throughout the world and history have looked up into the night sky and seen a powerful and unabashedly female figure shining down on them. The moon’s waxing phase, as it fills out and brightens the night sky, is an especially vivid symbol of pregnancy and fecundity, which are, of course, directly related to menstruation."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_effect
The term lunar effect refers to real or imaginary correlations between specific stages of the roughly 29.5-day lunar cycle and behavior and physiological changes in living beings on Earth, including humans. In some cases the purported effect may depend on external cues, such as the amount of moonlight. In other cases, such as the approximately-monthly cycle of menstruation in humans (but not other mammals), the coincidence in timing reflects no known lunar influence.

A considerable number of studies have examined the effect on humans. By the late 1980s, there were at least 40 published studies on the purported lunar-lunacy connection,[1] and at least 20 published studies on the purported lunar-birthrate connection.[2] This has allowed several extensive literature reviews and meta-analyses to be produced, which have found no correlation between the lunar cycle and human biology or behavior.

Out of this, in a time (neolithic ! Merlini/tablets 5300-6300 B.C. )when writing was or not discovered and people were not acustomed with numbers and counting, how could one remember,relate,corelate what day was before/ 40 days/ after when first prenancy simptoms occur !?

===================================================================
Sufficient bad, if 
- many scientists were and are supposing that Vinca civilisation was on the verge of discovering writing (in fact sure riched  the mnemonic/iconic stage with maybe forever lost meanings)
- many also said that especially Tartaria tablets carry kind of writing
- most fervent sustainer of Danubian writing is Mr.Marco Merlini,
- especially Tartaria round tablet shows signs wich could carry (if not sounds/words via syllabograms) absolutely sure at least  proto-writing via proto-cuneiform signs.

So pity enough that the world toughest and constant sustainer of Danubian writing if choosed to propose those moon-phases, in the situation that in fact we could in reality have writing, 

is going many steps way back to an stage before proto-writing. Moon phases are in this case are (local or not) mnemonic signs coresponding to moon phases.
But if one is looking at the signs=moon phases on the tablet or on the real moon on sky not necessary is drawing conclusions on moving asters or female lunar cycle.
=======================================================================
Pity enough for Mr. Merlini, contrary of my first admiration reaction, I found that this "moon-phases" idea is not so new and  was not his discovery, nor the first-one to display for the first time.
Compare:
1.MERLINI: Chronograms from the Danube Civilization to procreate a Child of the Moon
Constantin-Emil Ursu, Adrian Poruciuc, Cornelia-Magda Lazarovici (eds.), From Symbols to Signs, Editura Karl A. Romstorfer, Suceava, 2015: 133-200and
2.R.KOLEV Bab Sky Science Collection 01 Abstract | Babylonia | Astronomy - Scribd
https://www.scribd.com › document › Ba...
by Rumen Kolev A COLLECTION of writings from 2000 - 2010 .... DECODING of the TARTARIA TABLETS By Dr. Varna.22May-15 June 2008

3. Keith Massey,

November 21, 2008 http://aplaceofbrightness.blogspot.com/2008/11/moonlight-in-romania-tartaria-tablets_21.html
" Here is Quadrant I: 
 

The semicircle struck me as a probable moon symbol. But what does a moon represent? A reasonable option is to make a moon stand for the number of days in a lunar cycle. As i sat there, I wasn't sure myself of what a lunar cycle is exactly. I knew it was something short of 30 days. That led me to an intriguing possibility. What if the other inscription in Quadrant I is meant to also convey the number of days in a lunar cycle? What if Quadrant I is a sort of legend, showing the values that will be operative elsewhere? Now, the other inscription in Quadrant I appears to be three lines in a row with two lines pointing out in each direction.


 Perhaps each line stands for 10 and the lines pointing out are meant to convey subtracting one or two days from that sum. That would theoretically bring us to the number 28 or 29, which isn't far from the lunar cycle. Later at home with internet access, I was able to get the info that the exact lunar cycle is29.53 days. Now, I know what I just presented isn't a slam dunk. I'm going to ask you to consider it, however, in light of how this hypothesis plays out on the rest of this particular tablet."

sâmbătă, 25 august 2018

O cu totul noua si interesanta perspectiva asupra celor mai vechi scrieri din aria Danubiana si Egeeana.

Am obtinut foarte recent, (Aug.2018) o noua si proaspata perspectiva in urma studierii a doua lucrari :
- Iannis Kenanidis si V. Papakitsos "The Eteocretan Inscription from Psichro (Crete) is genuine " https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312038989_The_Eteocretan_Inscription_from_Psychro_Crete_is_Genuine pe de o parte, si a unei alte lucrari,
- autor A.A.Vaiman "On the quasi-sumerian tablets from Tartaria" http://www.archeo.ru/izdaniya-1/archaeological-news/annotations-of-issues/arheologicheskie-vesti.-spb-1994.-vyp.-3.-annotacii#section-22

http://www.archeo.ru/izdaniya-1/archaeological-news/arheologicheskie-vesti/AV_03.pdf/view
http://www.archeo.ru/izdaniya-1/archaeological-news/arheologicheskie-vesti/AV_03.pdf
Ca elemente de noutate,
- in prima lucrare se incearca cumva "taierea nodului gordian" adica din multe ipoteze privind limba folosita in inscriptiile eteocretane, autorii avansaza ipoteza unui amestec initial de populatii (deci si de limbi), in care un rol primordial l-a avut ( si din a careei limba s-au pastrat carcteristicile), o populatie care a colonizat initial Creta si care era de factura sumeriana
"Thus, to all those readers interested in the Eteocretan languages of ancient Crete, a novel approach of decipherment is presented herein, for the first time based on the Cretan Protolinear script theory [12] that suggests the affinity of the Psychro inscription to the Sumerian dialect of Crete. It will be demonstrated that the application of the Sumerian language for this decipherment provides a coherent and meaningful interpretation of the text on this inscription."
Din cate am inteles eu, desi limba nu a mai pastrat integral toate carcteristicile limbii sumeriene, in schimb scrisul a functionat ca un gen de constanta, in sensul ca semnificatia ideogramelor a fost retinuta, cunoscuta si pastrata de migrantii sumerieni= minoani, pe tot parcursul timpului (chiar pana inspre era noastra).
"As explained in previous works, the Cretan Protolinear script was created by the Minoans, who were Sumerian settlers [12,20,21,22]; the Cretan Protolinear script in the form of Linear A and Linear B was used by all the different nations that inhabited Crete and the Aegean. However, in the hands of non-Minoans (i.e. Hands of nonSumerians) the Cretan Protolinear script was distorted as time passed, and eventually forgotten, because the script was difficult for nonMinoans (=non-Sumerians). On the other hand, in the hands of Minoan Sumerians the Cretan Protolinear script could not be significantly distorted or forgotten, no matter how many generations would pass. This is because the Cretan Protolinear script (henceforth in this work referred to simply as “Protolinear”) was phonetic and pictographic at the same time: every phonetic (syllabic) sign was a sketch of a readily recognizable object in the Minoan Sumerian culture. So, for those who had Minoan Sumerian as their first language, every syllabic sign had the native name of the thing that the sign depicted, and they always knew what the signs depicted. They could not alter the shape of the signs lest they would be no more recognizable and if a sign was not recognizable it could not have a native (Minoan Sumerian) name, so it could not have a phonetic value. This is why the Protolinear script could not be altered in Minoan hands; while for non-Minoans there was no connection between depicted object and phonetic use of the Protolinear signs.Therefore, the Protolinear script survived unaltered as long as the Minoan nation existed. And we know that the Minoan Sumerian language, as other non-Greek languages spoken in Crete, was spoken not only until 300 BC but also much later [21], because those populations were relatively isolated geographically and socially. "
In legatura cu aceasta lucrare , eu am constatat (si nu am reusit pe moment si rapid sa-mi explic) de ce :
- tablitele pastreaza cumva in opinia mea un caracter dual, respectiv contin semne, si pot fi citite folosind atat scrierea sumeriana cat si separat folosind-o pe cea micaeniana (Linear A).            In plus,
- cea rotunda prezinta  semne f. apropiate de scrierea arhaica greceasca, mai precis de cea arhaica Cretana.

RELATIV LA CEA DE A 2-a LUCRARE,

- am fost intrigat si m-am necajit cumva ca lucrarea lui Aisik AbramovichVaiman are un parcurs sanatos si plin de chestiuni valoroase, constituind un gen de "concurent" al meu care cumva precede cercetarile mele cu cativa ani ( 1994 a dansului visa ultima editie 2018 ale mele).

-asta pe de o parte; in schimb lucrarea dansului are lacune, (doar jumatate din semne sant interpretate!) pe cand a mea este mai completa ( ex. explic clar si in amanunt, clar absolut toate semnele).



In aceeasi situatie (lucrare incompleta tot numai cu cca. jumatate din semne interpretate) este lucrarea cercetatorului bulgar Rumen Kolev.
"Altogether, sixteen of the eighteen Tartaria signs have been identified with the proto-Sumerian ones. Perhaps in the future it will be possible to find proto-Sumerian prototypes for the two remaining signs as well."
In fond rezultatul conteaza chiar daca este o contributie "colectiva".
In fond posibil Michael Ventris nu obtinea rezultatele de varf daca nu coresponda cu Arthur Evans).
Ce este interesant este faptul ca avem o parere comuna ca cel care a scris tabletele nu a fost un locuitor nativ al Transilvaniei.
Autorul avanseaza ipoteza unei origini si a unui autor de pe teritoriul Irakului (Sumer).
Because the Tartaria signs derive from early proto-Sumerian ones present on tabiets from Uruk layer IV, the Tartaria script apparently emerged in the last quarter of the 4th Millennium ВС. Nothing definite can be said as to where it was invented, but this hardly happened in Transylvania. More likely, its homeland was an area closer to Iraq. Functionally, the tablets were obviously economical documents.
Eu nu exclud nici-o ipoteza, dar dau mai multe sanse unei origini Cicladice-Egeene.

sâmbătă, 24 martie 2018

TARTARIA TABLETS.TARTARIA SQUARED TABLET (with hole)SUMERIAN APPROACH

TARTARIA SQUARED TABLET (with hole)
SUMERIAN APPROACH

Note
There is the only paper I know wich go strait as to proove that we have on Tartaria tablets writing. Even if not proper writing and one wich is using pictograms and ideograms so talking in fact of proto-writing. Is a paper of a bulgarian scientist RUMEN KOLEV :

ПЛОЧКИТЕ ОТ ТАРТАРИЯ И ЧАШАТА ОТ СУВОРОВО – ДВА „НАДПИСА” НА РАННАТА ДУНАВСКА КУЛТУРА И РАЗШИФРОВАНЕТО ИМ Румен Колев                          http://www.su-varna.org/izdanij/Magazin%201%20conf/Pages%20from%2046%20to%2053.pdf

 wich goes close to my conclusions of my sumerian aproach, but he choosed                                          -not to precise identify each sumerian sign and show their sumerian appearance (shape) and name. But luckily enough,                                                                                                                                     - he succeded to corect identify many of them (bull/cattle, god, temple, branch/corn, altar, idea of offering>>=sign "RU",etc.). Where he has the sun sign, I have the (sun)GOD sign wich is close.                                      All this green underlined are common with mines !
 - Either don't know why he not took the tablets separately and choosed to get meanings reading them only as beeing superposed !?.   

What Mr. Marco Merlini allready noticed the tablets were made and intended to be worned as a pair around neck. Thats's why the upper half is hidden by that squared-one.And not without reason or the only reason.Cause the message not to beeing seen or understood by passers-by and because seems that there are there "words of power" or related to deep magical rituals related to god(s). That mystical magical ritual was influencing the course of people's life and destiny!

So that's why at all I do not understand the logic of Mr. Kolev wich choosed to read the exposed message and not take account of the paramount importance of the hidden esoteric message                                                                                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------See exemple of proto-writing,proto-cuneiform writing and reading:

From Language, Literacy, and Technology https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/language-literacy-and-technology/ancient-writing-in-mehttps://static.cambridge.org/resource/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:17706:20160804090558862-0668:03648fig5_9.png?pub-status=live






http://www.proel.org/img/alfabetos/tartaria1.gif



Folowing picture from:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/ctNXPSKJyfGaXcuUdPssKqwWtp5LOvjsT5BBASOnp7TKHdqkmkWEaPmmTzMLNWB_nZkNYQ=s159


https://www.google.ro/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FmPEp8tA8kzQ%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DmPEp8tA8kzQ&docid=5fHqyqwkqGkKdM&tbnid=jTWKvw7kTTlFVM%3A&vet=10ahUKEwiXzrnMi7_ZAhVJlCwKHQ7yAL8QMwhqKB0wHQ..i&w=1920&h=1080&bih=662&biw=1366&q=tartaria%20tablets&ved=0ahUKEwiXzrnMi7_ZAhVJlCwKHQ7yAL8QMwhqKB0wHQ&iact=mrc&uact=8 

 We have folowing signs
- upper side, those little 3 D-s
Note
The signs seem not to be made in traditional proto-cuneiform technique .That type of signes were not made in traditional technique (pressing the other edge opposite to the sharp edge).So the writer seems not to be a native sumerian.
In sumerian proto-cuneiform these kind of signs were used to mark measures and numbers
As counting measures,:

Sum. Sign GAR
GAR
https://cdli.ucla.edu/files/publications/cdlj2012_002.pdf
by P Damerow - the sign. GAR designated, in fact, daily rations of barley prepared for workers from a certain amount of grain. The grain was probably, in order to make it ...

As number, (number 1); 60?





https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1d/Proto-cuneiform_sexagesimal_type_Sa.svg/2000px-Proto-cuneiform_sexagesimal_type_Sa.svg.png  

Image result for proto-cuneiform numbers

So maybe one sign count for number 1 or 60. 3 signs,so number 3 or 3x60=180

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSLco-QN7AVqzCl9dhlSEkDIA0uxO9JYMLnZ3R7VxC-kiI9vXpq

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Near-by signs like:

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Flinearbknossosmycenae.files.wordpress.com%2F2017%2F08%2Fcomparison-of-cretan-te-with-symbol-for-wheat-or-barley-in-various-ancient-scripts.jpg&h=ATP6b5jmRTB-BDaz5Ti2hyLcKMM3AmA_tRCEtkujDsUbmRfigPVMRl0I3G6p91_vvlugkzc7_SGi_a8PtpXKjMMzm-ik51wDKmgjd2MoTvQibNoS-1c&s=1


Sumerian sze/SE
SZE

Sum.SE:”barley,grain”




ŠE
 
niga, še

Also ratio
Sum. Sign GAR


Sumerian Beer - Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative - UCLA.edu

https://cdli.ucla.edu/files/publications/cdlj2012_002.pdf
by P Damerow - the sign. GAR designated, in fact, daily rations of barley prepared for workers from a certain amount of grain. The grain was probably, in order to make it …

>->->->->->->         DDD
>->->->->->->


The grain sign and those of units/portion must be related even because are close one of each-other.
Possible and proposed reading,:

3 ratio of grain/barley

Downward,


Note
See that both encircled signs.Every of them was ment to be read as such,isolated.So coresponding to a separate single meaning for every sign.Not to form words by combyning the signs.
This interpretation is the direct result of the fact that the signs are phisically isolated in kind of houses/boxes.
Y-like sign on the left,

The Proto-Sumerian Language Invention Process by John A. Halloran



PAPa@t PAP~a@t

pab, pap, pa4: father; brother; man; leader
 paþ[LUL]: leg.
pap: (cf., pab; pa4).


Or
TAR~d 

gú-tar: back of the head ('neck' + 'to cut (hair)').


Or sign


BAD
 
ba9, bad, be

From A New Edition of the Proto-Elamite 
Text MDP 17, 112 https://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2015/cdlj2015_001.html


https://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2015/cdlj2015_001_fig/figure2.jpg

Every sign listed above most likely represents some kind of dependent worker (except M346, if that is indeed what is being counted in MDP 17, 350). Therefore it appears that N2 is used exclusively, or almost exclusively, to count various types of dependent workers – as opposed products, commodities, or animals as in the proto-cuneiform corpus. If this is true, then proto-Elamite N2 and proto-cuneiform N2have nothing in common apart from their graphical similarity.

https://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2015/cdlj2015_001_fig/figure3.jpg

Figure 3: The Early Convergence of N2 and BAD.
SIGN  > convergence>BAD,TIL,US,UG

Even if N2 is used to denote dead or sacrificed animals in the Uruk corpora, the evidence for this is weak and the texts themselves are inconclusive. It is more likely that N2 in proto-cuneiform denotes the entities it counts as “other” or “special.” The meaning “dead” may then have been later attributed to it due to the confluence of the N2/“TIL” and “BAD” signs.

https://www.scribd.com/document/76183647/1800-Dicionario-Sumerio-Lexicon       til: to be ripe, complete; to pluck; to put an end to, finish; to cease, perish (iti, 'moon', + íl, 'to be high; to shine' ?) [? ZATU-644 archaic frequency: 65; concatenation of 2 sign variants] .
tìla, tìl, ti: n., life (tu, 'to be born', + íla, 'to lift, carry').
v., to live; to keep alive; to survive (with -da-); to dwell; to be halted (singular stem; cf. sig7).

bad, be: to open; to let out; to go away; to be at a distance; to drive away; to separate, remove
(regularly followed by ; cf., bara4 and semantics of bar) (open container with motion away from)
bàd: n., (city) wall [? EZEN archaic frequency: 114; concatenation of 3 sign variants] .
v., to climb, ascend.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Proto-cuneiform_sexagesimal_type_Sa.svg
File:Proto-cuneiform sexagesimal type Sa.svg

Sumerian 1(one)=dil

The reading of “Y”-sign is
 BAD

BAD :”to go away; to be at a distance; to drive; to separate 

Note. I am coming back after entire tablet reading and I change the above reading to
 BAD: “TO OPEN ; TO LET OUT

No,no much simple “one” (GOD)


_________ b o r d e r _____________ l i n e ____________
The sign on the right has a shape close to folowing proto-cuneiform signs:


Not the case of the sign

 GA’ARb1 GA’AR~b1 cause this sign is simetrical and our NOT.

 

Also not the symetrical X shape of
C

ZAG~c
 
Could be:
SZITAa3
 
But I am not enirely for it,cause has no middle line separation.
But folowing sign is much close:
ABa
 

Meaning
 

ab: window; opening; niche, nook (cf., aba).
aba, ab: lake; sea

 

Also (later?):

ab: window; opening; niche, nook (cf., aba).
aba, ab: lake; sea

AB sign reading:”temple,house

Next is folowing an “insect”-like sign, as one my take the vertical line as the body and the rest as legs.
Note
This sign is also isolated,”boxed
My first connexion or thought seeing so many spike-like lines was of:


AN
 
an: n., sky, heaven; the god An; grain ear/date cluster ('water' + 'high').
v., to be high.
adj., high.
prep., in front.
Wich could be as long as AN sign contain a cross, and superposed other X-es totaling a number of 12 spikes.
Close could be also the sign:
  
SZENNURa
 
But IS NOT cause of paralel couple lines(2x3)x2=also 12
Our sign has not couples of paralel lines.

Reading AN sign:”sky, heaven; the god An “

Folowing, (also isolated,”Boxed”),a cat-donkey-like head sign:

UD5~c

 
I am not 100% for it cause our head is not squarred as above sign,but much close to:

AMAR
 

amar:   calf; young animal (áma, 'wild cow mother', + re7, 'to accompany, plural')
Eg. áb-amar: mother cow ('cow' + 'calf').?
Reading of sign:

AMAR: CALF
-------------------------------b o r d e r----------- l I n e -----------------------------
Folowing in right extremity twoo signs.
This one on upper side conducted me first to see an head with hornes,like a goat.
If so the had is seeing to right.>>>
The folowing sign is not like our sign:

DARA3c
 
Or
GIR3@g~c

 

Note

Now I come back after surveyed entire tablet and I am confident that I choosed correctly AMAR:”CALF”

I rushed before and did not searched the meaning of sign GIR3.I thought was a goat.Now I am coming back, and found:

 

Full text of "The Sumerian Account of the Invention of Writing ..

https://archive.org/.../TheSumerianAccountOfTheInventionOfWritingaNew_djvu.txt
Some signs of the proto-cuneiform writing from Uruk do not seem to be the original invention on clay, but borrowings of signs already in existence on materials other than clay. The head of some animals such as donkey (ANSE), ibex (DARA 3 ), and ox (GIR3). and some other signs made up of curves and circles such as .

Much likely was composed using folowing signs:

HI

 
http://enenuru.net/pdfs/SumerianFreq100_1500.pdf SAR2(HI):”to be numerous


HI
 
da10, du10, dub3, dug3, 盧ォe, 盧ォi, ナ。ar2

And twwo signs:

BAR

 

From Sumerian Lexicon by John A. Halloran
https://www.scribd.com/document/76183647/1800-Dicionario-Sumerio-Lexicon      bar: n., (out)side; soul, innards; fleece [BAR archaic frequency: 306].
v., to open; to uncover, expose; to see; to remove; to be absent; to release; to peel, pare, shell; to select; to
divide; to split; to distribute; to keep away

* Folowing signs with close shape not proposed cause there are angled.
LA2
 
LISZ
 
LIS
 
dilim2

Hi-BAR


Sumerian Chinese - Forgotten Books

https://www.forgottenbooks.com/en/download/Chinese_and_Sumerian_1000130698.pdf
—. HI BAR,. ' spread out extended of a net and other things

(Reduplication means many and is enhancer)

 

The Class Reunion—An Annotated Translation and Commentary on the ...

https://books.google.ro/books?isbn=9004302107
The habitual character of the action is thus represented by the reduplication in {bar-bar} in the Sumerian and the use of a habitual nominal stem in Akkadian.

Hi-Bar-Bar:”be numerous,multiply,SPREAD OUT”

 

I am stressing, don’t know if theyr actual devellopement stage was one of proto-cuneiform or begun using proper cuneiform signs obtained using ligatures !

                            LAGAB

 
Two times LAL
 

We have the sign http://home.zcu.cz/~ksaskova/Sign_List.html LAL2xLAGAL wich is read NIGIN and/or NANGA
饞嚦饞喐
饞嚦饞喐
LAL2.LAGAB
(NANGA,聽NIGIN5, NIMEN, NIMGIN5, NINGIN5, 艩UR6(MesZL: ?), USAR3, USUR3, U艩AR3, USAR3)
751+755
482+483


The Sumerian Language, An Introduction to Its History and ...
https://edoc.site › the-sumerian-language-...
Descripción: The Sumerian Language, An Introduction to Its History and Grammatical Structure - Marie-Louise Thomsen... ... kim 'to change' kar 'to goltake away' kud.r 'to cut' kdr 'to act as an enemy, t o change' kGi.6 'to be troubled' 14 'to carry' 1u.g 'to swarm' nigin 'to wander
nigin ' to wander' pad.1 'to live (sing. tar ...
The Sumerian Language, An Introduction to Its Histor

nigin5, 7, 8, 9, nimen(3, 4, 5), nanga(2,3,4); naga district, province (Akkadian nagu(m) I, ‘region, district; coastal area (area litoranea)’[14
The End of the Dynasty of Nimrod-Enmekar (§§185-240)
www.christianhospitality.org › content
Heb. peleg = region and/or watercourse, Sumerian nanga, nigin or nishiga (or, nishima ), Akkadian nagu, nangu = region, or more specifically an irrigation region. (The ...






psd.museum.upenn.edu/epsd/illl/html/Sign/Ea/Proto-Aa.htm [nigin5(LAL2xLAGAB)

 etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/edition2/signlist.php
LAL×LAL.LAGAB Borger: LAL2.LAGAB, Sign, niĝin5

http://www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/Rechnici/Sumerian_Cuneiform_English_Dictionary_12.pdf                                            121B8 LAGAB | niĝin2 [214x] = encircle, go around

The Early Stages of the Sumerian City at Tell Zurghul: New Results ...

https://www.researchgate.net/.../321156232_The_Early_Stages_of_the_Sumerian_City_..theSumerian city of Nigin, the third city

Nero, etimo - Agorà Magazine

www.agoramagazine.it/index.php?option=com_k2...id...
... nigin (2). n., enclosure, circle; capacity;whole (cf., kilib and gur4-gur4) [NIGIN archaic frequency]. v., to halt, turn away; to turn round; to start over; to surround; to enclose ..... [5] John Alan Halloran, Sumerian lexicon, Los Angeles, Logogram 

Now see how the head of the BULL(SUN) is consisten also with reading  LAL2.LAGAB, Sign, niĝin5 :”to turn round; to surround; to enclose “ wich could be applied to the Sun.

3. na-anNan(NISH2ni8-ishi)-ĝa = Nanga = Peleg. The unusual spelling of the name may be taken to indicate that the name read originally Nishiga (or Nishima) was pronounced later Nanga. (For nigin = nishima see ePSD s. nigin5, Lexical.) Heb. peleg = region and/or watercourse, Sumerian nanga, nigin or nishiga (or, nishima), Akkadian nagunangu = region, or more specifically an irrigation region. (The peculiar way the name is written, viz. with the signs na.an.gish[or:nish2].ni8[or:li].ish[i]-ma[or:ĝa], has led to the idea that the name is “Na-an-gish li-ish-ma” [“May he listen (lishma) joyfully (nangish)”], as nish2 is more commonly read gish, and ni8, more commonly read li.) The word nigin (otherwise nanga or nishiga etc.) is also written with the sign BULUG (in which case it means a boundary of a region or a boundary marker), Akkadian puluggu or pulukku, which is the same as the Heb. peleg. According to Genesis 10. 25, it was in the days of this patriarch that the “earth was divided,” which implies the creation of geographical (“earth”) regions, as well as the dispersion of tribes. The Hebrew root p-l-g means not only “divide (regionally)” but also “divide (linguistically).” Peleg means “(man of) different regions” and “(man of) different languages.” The historical context is the dispersion of nations and consequent confusion of language at the Shinar Tower.

OOOPS!


But if want my opinion,the sign is not a complex,ligaturred,composed-one because I am expecting that the writing pertain to pre-cuneiform fase in wich were used simple signs,So sufficient the sketch of the bull(head)
00001. 


---------------------------------------------
Folowing,the same sign AB for “house,temple
I wished to be and tempted to be


ZAG~c
 
Cause ZAG is meaning “shiny” as double-axe is.

SARGON PART

s-studies.0catch.com/DocRob/sargon/sargon004.htm
If Professor Waddell is right in identifying the "Sumerian Father-god" Zagg with the Cretan god Zeus (**2) he, too, offers a link between the Babylonian and Cretan religions. We have already seen that Sargon was perhaps sometimes called Zaggisi, (**3) so probably both Zagg and Zeus were mythological representatives of

 
mpressions of two cylinder seals (Sumer) and glyph of 'ingot'. The person at the feet of the eagle-winged person carries a (metal) dagger on his left-hand, clearly demonstrating the link with this metalware catalog.
Note the one-horned bull below the person who has his foot on mountain-summit.
Sumerian sign for the term ZAG ‘purified precious’. The ingot had a hole running through its length Perhaps a carrying rod was inserted through this hole.

Bouth signs:

    Up->           “Be numerous,multiply,SPREAD OUT

   Down->                   “House

By chance I found that those very signs we have, associated are signifying:


NERGAL~x
https://cdli.ucla.edu/tools/SignLists/protocuneiform/archsigns/NERGAL~x.jpg
 
- But we have no the first sign  this goat-shape even not shure at all that is depicted a goat-head,
- Think our sign is an made-assembled signs resulting an word


I am convinced that Nergal is the netherworld aspect of the sun-god, on the basis of late mystical texts which I had looked at in the Erra thread.
There appears to be a connection between Nergal and Shamash. It has indeed been argued that the Mesopotamians saw them as alter-egos (Porada 1948, 47; von Weiher 1971, 26, 31), Nergal governing the underworld and Shamash the sky
Dalley mentions in Myths from Mesopotamia p. 283 that Nergal/Erra was the "patron of copper smelting"

This is the first time I have heard of this important point, as it would accord with the idea that Nergal is a god of fire…………. Nergal and his connection to mining 

       B E S I D E                                             
! Nergal is quite opposite to first reading cause only at the begining was a pair of Sun-God Utu/Shamashis specific the Godd/ess of Mid-day sun,

Geschichte des Altertums: Erster Band. Zweite Hälfte. Die ältesten ...

https://books.google.ro/books?isbn=3734005736 - Translate this page
Eduard Meyer Ne-unu-gal „Herr der großen Wohnung“ für Nergal (ebenso später Amar-ut „Kind der Sonne (?)“ für Marduk, dingir-pa „Gott des Griffels“ für ...
,later a God/ess of the underworld and DEATH !

Note
Despite the fact that I found the sign AMAR:”CALF” in the before section,when encountered that last horned-like sign, my mind was toward goat and some-how attached to GOAT (despite the fact that could be the head of a bull.Did not realised or thought)
Now I understand why  combined sign BULL & HOUSE

The God Resheph in the Ancient Near East

https://books.google.ro/books?isbn=3161524918
Maciej M. Münnich -Sumerian lists of geographical names it would be better to translate it as “City/seat of the bull = Nergal" by analogy to the similarly constructed Sumerian names such as: SES.UNU'“ (Ur — seat of Nanna), MUSUNU“ (Zabalam — seat of inanna), UD.UNU'“ (Larsa — seat of Utu); see Katz …

Now I change my opinion from:
up= composed sign; downAB:”house” :50%
             Reading them as a pair: N E R G A L :50%

To the opinion:

NERGAL~x
https://cdli.ucla.edu/tools/SignLists/protocuneiform/archsigns/NERGAL~x.jpg
 

Now we have on entire tablet:

 3 portions
 grain
                AN       CALF       NERGAL
To open      ( Sky-God)  (Sun-God?)
To let out


Sumerian Cuneiform English Dictionary 12013CT - bulgari-istoria

www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/.../Sumerian_Cuneiform_English_Dictionary_12.pdf
 sign evolution, that it goes from the proto drawings to the cool Sumerian ...... amar-utu = MARDUK (bull calf of the sun god utu – northern hemisphere 12 day winter solstice celebration of.


Possible the tablet was ment and used in a fertility ritual.
The were giving grain offering and addressed to the Gods ?  An (Sky-God) and Nergal (pair of Sun-God or underworld deity) ?

Even remain other second close-by possible interpretation of BAD sign with an reading :”drive/go away” or read as til: to be ripe, complete; to pluck; to put an end to, finish; to cease, perish ,distress/death” reading in the situation there was encountered draught and famine folowed by people death.

Ooops!…apropos of double-axe and Nergal:

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/reptiles/serpent_tribe/serpent_tribe15.htm

THE AXE, IN SUMERIAN USAGES

"The God of Jupiter is the Lord of Magicians, MARDUK KURIOS of the Double-headed Axe." - Necronomicon, p. 30 (AVON Edition).
Laurence Austine Waddell, in The Makers of Civilization in Race and History, (1929), sheds some light on the significance of the axe:
"The Double-Axe sign for the God Zeus in Crete also occurs as a sign for the god ZAG [1] in Sumerian. It is found in the inscription of Manis-Tusu's grandfather; and it is obviously a fuller form of the diagrammatic axe-sign in Sumerian, which has the phonetic value of ZAG or SAG, and is defined as 'axe, sceptre, two-edged sword.' And significantly this axe-sign is a title in Sumerian of 'The GREAT LORD' (NAR-GAL) [Ner-Gal from his fatal smiting still later became the God of the Underworld.], a martial reflex of the Father-God ZAGG, SAKH, or SAX [2], i.e., Zeus, who became latterly the 'God of War' in Babylonia; and Manis' father SARGON worshipped the weapon of the God ZAGG as we have seen."



Note
Do not consider this work  as an ultimate finding and interpretation.
When begun some years before my proposed goal was only this-one: to proove and show that Tartaria Round tablet is containing writing.
Now the same goal with both tablet.(With this tablet the same).I am not pretending at all an accurate reading.                 Schollars (sumerologists) could take and analyse the tablets and afteward give and show their opinion.
Don’t know why one of so many world scientists not put one of the tablets on their desk to analise the signs/tablet  throughly.Radher  stayed in kind of wondering,extasy and at the end expectation.