SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS RESULTING FROM RESEARCH ON TARTARIA TABLETS
- An homage to the scientists (+) Zsofia Torma and Nicolae Vlassa who foresee and gave evidences for the nature of the signs and the age of the tablets.
- -----------------------------------------------------------
- This is the result of allmost 11 years of throughly research.By short, was an fantastic, fantabulous endeavour to wich became addicted, and also only at the finish realising that was exhausting.
- SOME (ONLY) OF MY CONLUSIONS ARE QUITE SHOCKING, BECAUSE ARE BY LITTLE ASIDE OF THE UP TO NOW COMMON COURSE OF OPINIONS.Documenting from scientific sources is time-consuming and people are excited when told misteryous stories. Such of a tribe wich burned their ruller when become old !? Or of an wich, diformed shaman-priestess in better case, wich made rituals using psichedelic/psychotropic potions.
- WHAT IS REVEALING MY RESEARCH IS NOT MATCHING ESPECIALLY THAT ONES ADVANCED BY ARCHAELOGISTS, (BUT CANNOT SAY THE SAME WITH THAT OF TOP-LEVEL ASSYROLOGISTS/EPIGRAPHERS ).
- FOR EVERY STATEMENT OR ASSERTION MADE HERE, I AM AT THE DISPOSAL OF INTERESSED PERSONS AND SHOW THE EVIDENCES WITH WICH I CAN SUSTAIN, ADING SIMILAR OPINIONS OF OTHER 3 SCIENTISTS.
- If I realised that cannot rely on archaeology dispersed data, my arguments are based on a profound and throughly analysis of the signs and “writing” from wich one could easy deduce my personal contribution. I renounce to order the conclusions upon a subjective criteria (such as "importance" could be).
- Note: Every personal conclusion wich was partly advanced by others will be marked with *, and wich was not advanced by others before, will be marked with *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE AGE OF THE TABLETS ARE FAR AWAY OF THOSE MANY AGES ALLREADY SUPPOSED, (ARE NEWER)* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE AGE SPAN BETWEEN THAT OF SUPPOSED PRIESTESS (wich bone’s are true 5300 B.C.) AND THAT OF THE TABLETS COULD BE AS MUCH AS 2.500 YEARS, (5500-3000=2500)OR EVEN 3.500(5.500-2.000=3.500)!*** --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- NEVER-ENDING-STORIES(LADY VINCA!?) ARE GOOD FOR MOOVIE-PICTURES BUT NOT PUSHING SCIENCE FORWARD, BUT ON CONTRARY ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- IN THE ARCHAELOGICAL SITE, ON THE VERY SPOT, SOMETHING TERRIBLE WRONG HAPPENED!* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE TABLETS WERE NOT SCRATCHED BY A NATIVE SUMERIAN* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE SIGNS ARE NOT SUMERIAN PROPER BUT SUMERIAN-INFLUENCED* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE TABLETS WERE NOT SCRATCHED BY A TARTARIA OR TURDAS NATIVE* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE TABLETS SEEM TO BE “WRITTEN” BY AN TRADER OR CRAFTSMEN SETTLED IN AREA OR PASSING BY, BUT RATHE (SURELY) COMING FROM AEGEAN AREA* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE TABLETS/SIGNS”WRITING” SHOW AN DIRECT STRONG INFLUENCE FROM NEAR EAST IF NOT EXACTLY FROM SUMER* -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- EVIDENCES ON THE TABLETS OF SIMILARITIES WITH AEGEAN WRITINGS ( Cretan Hierogliphic, Linear A ,Linear B and Eteocretan)* --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- SIMILARITIES WITH ANATOLIAN WRITINGS (ESP. CARIAN)*** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE TABLETS ARE CONTAINING A BUNDLE OF 3 DIFFERENT CATEGORIES/TYPES OF SIGNS, WICH SEEM NOT TO BE DIRECT-INTERNALY RELATED ALL ONE WITH ANOTHER, WITH THE CONSEQUENCE THAT WE CANOT EXTRACT AN CONTINOUS UNITY AS WE ARE READING NOWDAY AN MASSAGE WICH IS CONTINOUS (NOT DISRUPTED).*** -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- I FOUND WRONG IDENTIFICATIONS, MISSED SIGNS(SIGNS NOT FOUND),etc. IN OTHER'S INTERPRETATIONS,etc. SO I AM PRETENDING THAT MY INTERPRETATION IS ONE OF TOP-LEVEL.* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- MY CONCLUSIONS (NUMBERED) SUPERPOZE IN GREAT MEASURE ON OTHER SCIENTISTS CONCLUSIONS, (IN GREAT MEASURE WITH THAT OF ASSYROLOGISTS A.A.VAIMAN and RUMEN KOLEV)* ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE TABLETS AS A WHOLE, ARE NOT CONTAINING AN TRUE WRITING, AS PUBLIC IS ACCUSTOMED WITH, WICH IS ABLE TO TRANSMIT AN COHERENT MESSAGE..ARE CONTAINING IDEOGRAMS,LOGOGRAMS &ICONS WICH COULD BE INTERPRETED AND NOT READ.* --------------------------------------------------------------
- THE ICONS WICH THERE ARE PRESENT ON THEM ARE OF TREMENDOUS AND PARAMOUNT CULTURAL IMPORTANCE WICH WERE USED IN ANCIENT TIME ON EXTENDED AREA. THEIR ORIGIN IS FAR DEEP IN TIME*** -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- EVEN SO, THERE ARE STRONG EVIDENCES AND CLUES THAT ONLY UPPER HALF OF THE ROUND TABLETIS CONTAINING TRUE WRITING (Archaic greek). BY CHANCE OR NOT THIS IS THE VERY AREA WICH WAS HIDDEN (COVERED BY THE OTHER SQUARED TABLET).MAYBE NOT WITHOUT PURPOSE. THE WORDS REFFERED MAYBE TO SOMETHING SACRED,HOLY FOR THEM, AND THE TABLETS COULD BE USED IN MISTERY-RELIGIOUS RITUALS .*** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- THE TABLETS SHOW AN HODGE-PODGE OF SIGNS. NO ONE WRITING SYSTEM WAS USED SOLE/EXCLUSIVE. THE SCRIBE WHOEVER COULD HAVE BEEN HAD SOME KNOWLEDGE OR GATHERED MANY SIGNS. DEFINITELE WAS NOT A MASTER OVER MANY WRITING SYSTEMS. WAS THE MASTER OVER OWN'S TIME WRITING AND LANGUAGE. MAYBE THAT'S WHY CANNOT BE EVIDENCED THE USING OF ONE, OR SINGLE WRITING SYSTEM.
- -
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu